Expanded Club World Cup Sparks Player Welfare Debate

The expanded FIFA Club World Cup in the United States has concluded its group stage, setting the stage for two weeks of intense knockout matches. The tournament's expansion from 7 to 32 teams has sparked controversy regarding player welfare, particularly due to matches played in extreme temperatures and often with disappointing attendance figures.

Controversy and Contrasts

Critics argue the tournament primarily serves to boost FIFA's finances, while the governing body maintains it's essential preparation for next summer's expanded 48-team World Cup across Canada, the US, and Mexico. The competition has showcased dramatic contrasts:

• Record-breaking victories like Bayern Munich's 10-0 demolition of Auckland City
• Thrilling encounters featuring 4-4 and 4-3 scorelines

Extreme Conditions Challenge Players

Player workload has become a major concern, with top clubs like Real Madrid playing up to 65 matches since August. The extreme conditions have compounded these challenges:

• Matches played in 36°C heat (Charlotte, North Carolina)
• "Code red" heat warnings forcing modified training sessions
• Frequent cooling breaks with players using ice towels and water bottles
• Thunderstorm delays affecting five matches due to lightning protocols

These conditions raise concerns for the 2026 World Cup, which will use many of the same venues.

Mixed Attendance Figures

The tournament has seen both packed stadiums and disappointing crowds:

• 18 of 48 group matches attracted over 40,000 spectators
• Record attendance: 80,619 at PSG's 4-0 victory over Atletico Madrid (Rose Bowl)
• Several matches played in near-empty arenas